|
Teacher
|
FOCARELLI CARLO
(syllabus)
1. Introduction to international law
2. Peculiarities of international adjudication.
3. International adjudication in disputes between states.
4. International adjudication in disputes concerning human rights.
5. International criminal justice.
6. International arbitration in foreign investments.
7. International Courts and tribunals operating withing autonomous legal systems
8. Analysis of a number of cases decided by the European Court of Human Rights
Cases:
1. Otto-Preminger Institute v. Austria, Appl. 13470/87, ECtHR Judgment of 20 September 1994
2. Laskey, Jaggard e Brown v. UK, Appl. 21627/93, 21826/93a nd 21974/93, ECtHR Judgment of 19 February 1997
3. Chapman v. UK, Appl. 27238/95, ECtHR Judgment of 18 January 2001 [GC]
4. S.A.S v. France, Appl. 43835/11, ECtHR Judgment of 1 July 2014 [GC]
5. Lautsi v. Italy, Appl. 30814/06, ECtHR Judgments of 18 March 2011 [GC]; ECtHR Judgment of 3 November 2009 [Chamber]
6. Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italia, Appl. 23458/02, ECtHR Judgment of 24 March 2011 [GC]
7. Al-Jedda v. UK, Appl. 27021/08, ECtHR Judgment of 7 July 2011 [GC]
8. Hirsi Jamaa et al. v. Italy, Appl. 27765/09, ECtHR Judgment of 23 February 2012 [GC]
9. Movimento Raëlien Suisse v. Switzerland, Appl. 16354/06, ECtHR Judgment of 13 July 2012 [GC]
10. Costa and Pavan v. Italy, Appl. 54270/10, ECtHR Judgment of 28 August 2012
11. Nada v. Switzerland, Appl. 10593/08, ECtHR Judgment of 12 September 2012 [GC]
12. Nasr and Ghali c. Italy (“Abu Omar” case), Appl. 44883/09, ECtHR Judgment of 23 February 2016
13. Animal Defenders International v. UK, Appl. 48876/08, ECtHR Judgment of 25 April 2013 [GC]
14. Cestaro v. Italy, ECtHR Judgment of 7 April 2015, Appl. 6884/11
15. Oliari et al. v. Italy, Appl. 18766/11 and 36030/11, ECtHR Judgment of 21 July 2015
(reference books)
1. Carlo Focarelli, Giurisdizioni internazionali (Milan: Kluwer/Cedam, 2017). The Introduction and Part I are included, Part II is excluded.
2. Carlo Focarelli, Diritto internazionale (Padua: Cedam/Kluwer, 2015, 3° edn.). The following paragraphs are only included: §§ 80, 82, 140-166.
3. Fifteen cases decided by the European Court of Human Rights will be discussed in class*. Five of these cases, to be chosen by the student, are included in the material for examination.
The course presupposes adequate familiarity with international law in general. The book sub 2 is aimed at covering all of the areas of international law that are more relevant to international adjudication.
The above material for examination equally applies to both attending and non-attending students.
* Cases examined:
All judgments can be downloaded in English and/or in French by inserting the Application Number at http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"]}.
1. Otto-Preminger Institute v. Austria, Appl. 13470/87, ECtHR Judgment of 20 September 1994
2. Laskey, Jaggard e Brown v. UK, Appl. 21627/93, 21826/93a nd 21974/93, ECtHR Judgment of 19 February 1997
3. Chapman v. UK, Appl. 27238/95, ECtHR Judgment of 18 January 2001 [GC]
4. S.A.S v. France, Appl. 43835/11, ECtHR Judgment of 1 July 2014 [GC]
5. Lautsi v. Italy, Appl. 30814/06, ECtHR Judgments of 18 March 2011 [GC]; ECtHR Judgment of 3 November 2009 [Chamber]
6. Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italia, Appl. 23458/02, ECtHR Judgment of 24 March 2011 [GC]
7. Al-Jedda v. UK, Appl. 27021/08, ECtHR Judgment of 7 July 2011 [GC]
8. Hirsi Jamaa et al. v. Italy, Appl. 27765/09, ECtHR Judgment of 23 February 2012 [GC]
9. Movimento Raëlien Suisse v. Switzerland, Appl. 16354/06, ECtHR Judgment of 13 July 2012 [GC]
10. Costa and Pavan v. Italy, Appl. 54270/10, ECtHR Judgment of 28 August 2012
11. Nada v. Switzerland, Appl. 10593/08, ECtHR Judgment of 12 September 2012 [GC]
12. Nasr and Ghali c. Italy (“Abu Omar” case), Appl. 44883/09, ECtHR Judgment of 23 February 2016
13. Animal Defenders International v. UK, Appl. 48876/08, ECtHR Judgment of 25 April 2013 [GC]
14. Cestaro v. Italy, ECtHR Judgment of 7 April 2015, Appl. 6884/11
15. Oliari et al. v. Italy, Appl. 18766/11 and 36030/11, ECtHR Judgment of 21 July 2015
|
Università Roma Tre