PROJECT FEASIBILITY
(objectives)
IT’S BETTER TO BUILT QUALITY AND VERY LITTLE, RECOVERING THE EXISTING ASSETS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. THE FATE OF THE CITY IS "CONTRACTION", THE OPPOSITE OF THE EXPANSION WITHOUT RULES AND WITHOUT WASTE OF AREA. NOWADAYS THESE AREA IS DAILY EATEN BY UNREASONABLE CUBICS AND INDIVIDUALISTIC MASSING, UNABLE TO TALK TO EACH OTHER, ISOLATED AND DIFFERENT FROM THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE PLACES. TODAY, THE CITY IS HYPOTHESIZED FOR THE DENSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONS, WHICH MAKE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMAN BEINGS MORE INTIMATE. AS UMBERTO ECO SAYS, WHEN DESCRIBING THE PRECARIOUS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE INSTITUTIONS AND THE NEIGHBOURS, "... IT HAS TO BE ENVISAGED THE CONFIDENTIALITY AND CAUTION ...". IT WOULD BE HOPED THAT THEY WERE WIDESPREAD. IT IS DIFFUSED, NOW VICE VERSA, THE "NON-TRANSPARENCY" (IF NOT ILLEGALITY), ESPECIALLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY.
ONE ANSWER COMES FROM QUITE CONVINCING "BEST PRACTICES" EXAMPLES THAT COME FROM THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1) PROJECTS ARE CLEAR IN INTENTION; 2) FROM THE CREATIVE PHASE IT IS POSSIBLE TO GET THE REALIZATION, NOT WITHOUT OBSTACLES, BUT THROUGH COMPETENCE AND COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF PROCEDURES, STANDARDS, TECHNICAL INSIGHTS, CONSTANT AND REGULAR UPDATE ON TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES, ETC .; 3) SKILL AND CARE IN PLANNING, WITHOUT BEING CARRIED AWAY BY THE IMAGE THAT, TOO OFTEN, HAS THE FLAVOUR OF SELF REFERENCES.
|